Samsung withdraws European Apple injunction request

Samsung withdraws European Apple injunction requestVaguely interesting news here, in the seemingly never-ending courtroom brawlage between California's Apple and South Korea's Samsung.

Despite screaming "No surrender!" (or words to that effect) last month, Samsung has had a curious change of heart, and is no longer seeking a sales ban on Apple devices in Europe. What the...?

The South Koreans had claimed that Apple infringed on its standards-essential patents, and as such were keen to have an injunction served in the UK (hey, that's us!), France, Italy and the Netherlands.

However, a statement fired at The Verge reads: “Samsung remains committed to licensing our technologies on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, and we strongly believe it is better when companies compete fairly in the marketplace, rather than in court.

“In this spirit, Samsung has decided to withdraw our injunction requests against Apple on the basis of our standard essential patents pending in European courts, in the interest of protecting consumer choice."

The news comes just a few days after Judge Lucy Koh ruled that Samsung’s devices won’t be banned in the states.

Koh purred: "Samsung may have cut into Apple's customer base somewhat, but there is no suggestion that Samsung will wipe out Apple's customer base, or force Apple out of the business of making smartphones.”

However, it’s thought that Samsung’s withdrawal is perhaps the result of antitrust concerns. See, under EU law, Samsung is obliged to license its standards-essential patents, rather than wave them around in court in the hopes of a ban.

We’re hoping against hope that we might’ve reached a turning point in this patent-based litigation nonsense, but we ain’t holding our breathing tubes.

Add a comment

Pondlife  Dec. 19, 2012 at 16:35

You can only license them if the company shows any inclination to pay though..

matt101101 / MOD  Dec. 19, 2012 at 17:37

You can only license them if the company shows any inclination to pay though..
Which I think Apple did...just not nearly enough money.

jb66  Dec. 19, 2012 at 18:04

apple is one of samsungs biggest customers, they would be hurting themselves with a ban

Pondlife  Dec. 19, 2012 at 18:09

Not if they've already paid for the chips and screens. ;)
Besides all it would have done was get Apple to the table with a proper price for the patents as Samsung have to accept a fair price.


You don't need an account to comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.